Public, hybrid, or private – the topic of the cloud is hotly debated. Recently unsettled by the Privacy Shield’s fall, companies are looking for cheap and robust solutions for their IT system landscape. Anyone who prioritizes IT security will inevitably end up with the private cloud.
The in-house operation of private cloud structures poses challenges. As an alternative, data centers provide a secure location, and not just for the servers. Companies that use the existing expertise of colocation operators implement private cloud projects more efficiently.
Where IT Structures Age
On-premises approaches seem safer at first glance. In reality, however, many server rooms do not meet the requirements for a secure IT operating environment. This means a permanent assurance of operational capability by our employees. Here, the IT department neglects its core task of providing business processes and not maintaining the infrastructure. Inadequate budgets make the rest and the IT infrastructure age quickly. At the same time, there is a lack of modern IT security such as IPS systems, firewalls, network monitoring, and fire protection concepts. In the worst case, procedures are open to attackers on the Internet.
The Risks Of The Public Cloud
The trend of outsourcing IT to the public cloud harbors risks and hidden costs. Anyone who thinks neither risk assessment nor GDPR when outsourcing existing systems ignores massive data protection problems with non-European providers. Here are my top 3 concerns:
- It’s worth looking at what’s on offer: there are no suitable workloads for many applications and processes. Flipping a switch in the backend can quickly lead to unexpected costs. As a result, high bills beckon for misconfigurations. Calculating the CPU, memory, and workload requirements can lead to a lack of transparency in the range of services right from the start and make the service unpredictable.
- For the IT remaining in the company, cost-intensive IT infrastructure and security must continue to be made available. Hybrid solutions from on-premises and public cloud mean uncertainty in the operability of business processes and additional effort in system support.
- The biggest shortcoming is the feeling of legal insecurity. The responsibility of the public cloud often ends with the provision of the CPU and memory. Even the core systems such as Linux are the liability and responsibility of the customer.
Advantage Colocation And Private Cloud
Providers specializing in colocation have a core mission: optimal infrastructure for companies, meaningful contract design, and the seamless transfer of liability. This way, companies retain their data sovereignty and an overview of all processes. IT departments can focus on their strategic job.
When choosing a partner, fail-safe internet connections, concepts for site networking, and hand-on services should be mandatory. It makes sense to check fire protection concepts and access controls to see whether they meet current requirements. The energy balance of the data center and its climate protection concept also contribute to the decision-making process.
Those who agree to the match between private cloud and colocation do not have to set up video conferencing systems and central project tools. Providers deliver data protection-compliant applications on a rental basis. A managed private cloud solution costs far below what it costs to run the server and maintain yourself. The difference to the public cloud: In addition to the Internet connection, maintenance, and backups of the application, users also receive services simultaneously.